Saturday, March 7, 2015

UCI Banning of the US Flag and the Destruction of the Nation State

Image result for UCI bans flag     The problem with erosion is that most of the time it can't be seen and takes places over decades or longer.  Take for instance, termites (a form of erosion through destruction), the outside home or building look strong, but it is slowly being eaten away until what's left is only a shell of its former self.  I use this analogy to address the topic of what recently transpired on the University of California, Irvine campus (sadly a campus I attended for one quarter before transferring to UCR).
     The school has voted that the American flag can no longer be flown in the lobby of the campus.  And according to Breitbart, "The language of the bill claims that flags “construct cultural mythologies and narratives that in turn charge nationalistic sentiments,” and further charges that “flags construct paradigms of conformity and sets homogenized standards for others to obtain which in this country typically are idolized as freedom, equality, and democracy.” Guevara’s resolution goes further on to say that “freedom of speech, in a space that aims to be as inclusive as possible, can be interpreted as hate speech.”.  So now the American flag is considered hate speech on a campus that receives funding from that same country!
     I bring up this example to briefly touch on a much larger subject, and that is the destruction of the Nation State (eliminating individual countries in the advancement of a global government).  This unfortunately is not in the least bit a conspiracy.  This author is working on a Master's degree from the most prominent Political Science program in the nation, The Maxwell School.  Required reading demands the reading of United Nations proposals and agendas, and what is casually regarded as scholarly reading is actually quite scary.  Whether it be Agenda 21, or Bush's 'Trilateral Commission', or the simple statement on our dollar 'Novus Ordo Seclorum' (New World Order)...the United Nations have been trying to destroy the borders of every country.  How?
Image result for un flag images
     One very clever way is to slowly erode a people's belief in their own nations character and history.  The United States is a key example.  Over the last 80-90 years the Progressive, or Democratic Party, has been trying to convince the Nation that our founders, fiscal leaders, and prominent figures were evil and consumed with greed and racism.  There are virtually no facts to back this up, unless you look at the Democratic Party's history, but that is not the point of this article.  Slowly, but surely, our leaders are eroding our faith in our nations greatness, and this is happening in other countries as well.  It starts with the banning of the flag, just as a termites first bite, and then before you know it our nation is a shell of what it once was.  Sadly, we are already a shell of who we once were.  10 years ago I wrote a rebuttal to a UN article 'The Destruction of the Nation State'...Might be a interesting read considering how long ago the UN was being bombarded with this ideal.

By Jeffrey Brandon Lee

     

Friday, March 6, 2015

A Little Conspiracy Can Be Fun At Times: Obama's 3rd Term

Image result for pictures of obama     I have been watching the news over the last few weeks and I came to one of many conclusions.  This is purely for you to draw your own conclusions.  I have seen many conspiracy theories of an Obama 2016 run for a third term as President of the United States.  He would have to hurdle the 22nd Amendment, but then again, he has hurdled many other Constitutional limitations.  I don't want to get into the 22nd Amendment too deeply, as there is a clause that would allow a third term based on 3/4 support from Congress.  I would like to look at what's transpiring with Hillary Clinton.
     Many major Democratic supporters realize that Clinton is the only viable Presidential candidate that they have, Biden?, yeah sure, Gore possibly.  So as the momentum was beginning to gather for Clinton's 2016 push...suddenly the fact that she used a personal server gets out, which was in direct violation of a law Obama imposed.  It's not that this information got out, but it is who leaked it...the New York Times.  The New York Times is an extremely liberal newspaper that supported the Clinton's while they were in office, and has carried the water for Obama ever since.  Why would they sacrifice the next great hope of the Democratic Party?  Yes, there have long been differences between the Obama's and Clinton's and they obviously do not like each other, but why serve up for the slaughter your former Secretary of State?
Image result for pictures of obama
     The liberal media is pulling out its hair trying to figure out what will happen if Hillary's campaign ends.  They have no other viable options to present to the American public that could potentially defeat the Republican nominee (which may be no better), or do they...If enough scandals are leaked on the Clinton's, including the newest sex scandal with Bill, and Clinton is deemed unelectable...What are the Democrats to do?
     In steps a 'humble' Obama, willing to save the Democratic Party by running for a third term (perhaps against an unelectable Jeb Bush, or Chris Christie), which he 'has no desire' to do.  The media fawns over the reborn 'savior' and does all it can to turn the American public in his favor in an attempt to install a new dictator.  As I said, this is conspiracy theory to be enjoyed, but also considered.  We have a President that has destroyed the balance of power between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government...What would stop an executive order granting a third term, say if we were involved in a serious war, as FDR did.  Enjoy any discussion this may bring up.

By Jeffrey Brandon Lee