A Little Conspiracy Can Be Fun At Times: Obama's 3rd Term

     I have been watching the news over the last few weeks and I came to one of many conclusions.  This is purely for you to draw your own conclusions.  I have seen many conspiracy theories of an Obama 2016 run for a third term as President of the United States.  He would have to hurdle the 22nd Amendment, but then again, he has hurdled many other Constitutional limitations.  I don't want to get into the 22nd Amendment too deeply, as there is a clause that would allow a third term based on 3/4 support from Congress.  I would like to look at what's transpiring with Hillary Clinton.

     Many major Democratic supporters realize that Clinton is the only viable Presidential candidate that they have, Biden?, yeah sure, Gore possibly.  So as the momentum was beginning to gather for Clinton's 2016 push...suddenly the fact that she used a personal server gets out, which was in direct violation of a law Obama imposed.  It's not that this information got out, but it is who leaked it...the New York Times.  The New York Times is an extremely liberal newspaper that supported the Clinton's while they were in office, and has carried the water for Obama ever since.  Why would they sacrifice the next great hope of the Democratic Party?  Yes, there have long been differences between the Obama's and Clinton's and they obviously do not like each other, but why serve up for the slaughter your former Secretary of State?

     The liberal media is pulling out its hair trying to figure out what will happen if Hillary's campaign ends.  They have no other viable options to present to the American public that could potentially defeat the Republican nominee (which may be no better), or do they...If enough scandals are leaked on the Clinton's, including the newest sex scandal with Bill, and Clinton is deemed unelectable...What are the Democrats to do?

     In steps a 'humble' Obama, willing to save the Democratic Party by running for a third term (perhaps against an unelectable Jeb Bush, or Chris Christie), which he 'has no desire' to do.  The media fawns over the reborn 'savior' and does all it can to turn the American public in his favor in an attempt to install a new dictator.  As I said, this is conspiracy theory to be enjoyed, but also considered.  We have a President that has destroyed the balance of power between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government...What would stop an executive order granting a third term, say if we were involved in a serious war, as FDR did.  Enjoy any discussion this may bring up.

By Jeffrey Brandon Lee

The Truth Behind the Christian Crusades: Protect the Innocent and End Islam's Dominance

     Many in the West have been misled as to the true reason for the Christian Crusades, and tend to view Islam as an innocent victim of European conquest.  This indoctrination can only be unwound by a careful study of Islam prior to the Crusades.  Although this work is in no means an exhaustive look into the past, it will attempt to give an overview of the time and what was transpiring.

     Islam has long been called a religion of peace, which proves if you keep repeating something long enough, eventually people will believe it.  The truth is Islam and its spread was based in war and the spilling of blood.  As Bryant Wright states, "Lewis went on to note that in the eighth century, Muslims conquered Spain and Portugal.  It was truly a religion on the move.  In their minds, these continued conquests reinforced the Superiority of Islam.  They continued on and invaded France, and, as I shared in chapter 1, if France had not turned back the Muslim onslaught in AD 732, most of Europe and eventually North and South America could have easily been dominated by the Muslim Faith."  Charles Martel's great victory saved Europe, but never stopped the Muslims belief in a worldwide Caliphate and dominance of Islam.

     Long before the Christian Crusades, the Muslims were Massacring any who would not submit to Islam.  In AD 633 Khalid al-Walid, whom Muhammed named 'The Sword of Allah', captured the city of Ullay's (todays Iraq) and beheaded so many people that the canals ran full with blood.  Muhammed led his Muslim forces to 66 straight victories in his murderous spread of Islam.  At one point the Muslims even sacked Rome herself.

     Constantinople had long been the Eastern Empires capital for Christendom, but it, Jerusalem and other Christian cities in the Middle East were coming under attack by Muslims and desperately needed help from the Western Empire based in Rome.  So the main purpose for the Crusades (allowing that some acted in error of the original purpose) was to protect Christian pilgrims, save Constantinople, and retake Jerusalem. 

     Yes, some Crusades went astray from the original purpose, but that does not change the fact that it was a defensive move against the onslaught of Islam.  The peaceful religion of Islam was eventually able to sack and take Constantinople and rename it Istanbul, and at the end of one Crusade the Muslim leader in Egypt had every Christian beheaded before him, while he ate lunch...that is all the Christians who couldn't pay the bribe.  I hope this very brief article sheds light on the true conquest nature of Islam.

By Jeffrey Brandon Lee